banner

What is Forensic Ballistics?

In regard to the analysis of the sequence of events that resulted in a gunshot wound, forensic ballistics is the study of firearms and projectiles. In order to recreate the events that led to the gunshot injury on a biological target, factors like the geometry of a bullet tract and gunshot residue, or GSR, are frequently utilized.


Branches of Forensic Science


The work of connecting bullets to the used weapons by microscopic analysis, and ultimately the use of those weapons to identify the people who fired those rounds, is handled by firearm examiners. In order to identify the registered owner of a firearm, the latter link looks at erased serial numbers.

Different types of existing ballistics

Internal, transitional, exterior, and terminal ballistics are divided into four groups. According to internal ballistics, the action takes place from the moment the propellant ignites until it reaches the gun's barrel's end. When a projectile exits the muzzle until the pressure behind it equalizes, this is referred to as transitional ballistics, the process between internal and external ballistics.
The trajectory of the bullet after it leaves the barrel is known as external ballistics. While terminal ballistics describes a projectile's specific behavior when it collides with a target.

Comparison microscope for the visual examination of bullets and cartridge cases

Every time a bullet is fired, the gun leaves microscopic imprints, often known as "ballistic fingerprints," on the bullet and cartridge case. When bullets are retrieved from a crime scene, the markings left behind can be compared to those left behind by a bullet fired during a test fire with the suspect's weapon. The same kind of comparison is used for cartridge cases in order to determine whether the bullets from both settings were shot from the same firearm.
In order to compare two specimens side by side under two compound light microscopes, firearm examiners use a comparison microscope. This device enables the examiner to view both images in one field of view from the center eyepiece. A system known as the "optical bridge" that consists of prisms, mirrors, and lenses connects the specimen stages and enables simultaneous observation of both specimens.

Class Characteristics vs. Individual Characteristics of Bullets

When a firearm examiner examines two bullets, they take into account both the class features and the specific characteristics that the bullets can fall under. Individual characteristics are those of an object that, with a high degree of certainty, can be assigned to a common source. Class characteristics are those of an object that allocate it to a specific source or group.
The caliber, the rifling's twist orientation, and the number of lands and grooves are all considered bullet-class features. These properties, which are not specific to a single bullet but are shared by many, are referred to as class characteristics. In contrast, a bullet's unique qualities are caused by flaws and marks caused by rust, damage, or instruments that create the bullet's lines and grooves.
When test bullets fired from a suspect's handgun and evidence bullets recovered from crime scenes share common class traits as well as individual characteristics, it is possible to infer that the suspect's gun was used to shoot the test bullets.

GSR Analysis can determine if a firearm was used

Gunshot residue, commonly referred to as the "muzzle-to-target" distance, can be used in conjunction with bullet comparison analysis to establish whether a particular bullet was responsible for a defect on the target.
A gunshot residue test may also reveal if a person fired a gun or was nearby when it did, depending on the circumstances. Heat-fused compounds from the priming combinations (lead, barium, and antimony), metal, and unburned gunpowder dropped onto nearby surfaces, including clothing and skin of people. The pattern and pigmentation that have been left on the surface reveal how close the handgun was to the surface.
The method of particle analysis allows for the identification of specific gunshot residue particles based on the observation of morphology and elemental analysis. Because of the measurement accuracy and sample preservation benefits of scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS), particle analysis can be performed.
However, several restrictions might diminish the significance of gunshot residue as a piece of judicial evidence. One of the drawbacks is how easily GSR may be removed from a surface. According to examiners, gunshot traces can be easily removed by washing your hands, and your clothes, or just by gently touching the flesh in your pocket.
Another drawback is the absence of concrete evidence to show which person nearby the weapon had actually discharged it. Although this is frequently viewed as a benefit, the large number of suspects lengthens the time it takes to finally prosecute the culprit once all other suspects have been ruled out.

Case Study

Forensic ballistics is a branch of forensic science that involves the examination of firearms, ammunition, and other related evidence to help solve crimes. It plays a crucial role in determining the source and trajectory of bullets and other ballistic evidence found at crime scenes. In this article, we will discuss a case solved using forensic ballistics.

The Case of the Beltway Snipers:


In October 2002, a series of shootings occurred in the Washington D.C. area, which would become known as the Beltway sniper attacks. The shootings were carried out by two individuals, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, who used a high-powered rifle to shoot victims from a long distance. The shootings occurred over a span of several weeks and resulted in the deaths of ten people and the injury of several others.

As investigators began to search for the perpetrators, they quickly realized that the weapon used in the shootings was not a standard hunting rifle. Rather, it was a high-powered rifle that had been modified to fire multiple rounds quickly, making it more difficult to detect and locate the shooter. The weapon used in the shootings was identified as a Bushmaster XM-15, a type of AR-15 rifle.

The forensic ballistics team was tasked with examining the ballistic evidence found at the crime scenes, including the bullets, shell casings, and other evidence. They also examined the rifles found in the possession of the suspects. By comparing the evidence found at the crime scenes to the rifles recovered from the suspects, the ballistics team was able to establish a link between the two.

Through their analysis, the ballistics team was able to determine that the rifle used in the shootings had been modified with a device known as a "bump stock." This device allowed the shooter to fire multiple rounds quickly, increasing the lethality of the weapon. The team also found that the bullets used in the shootings were consistent with the ammunition found in the possession of the suspects.

In addition to the ballistic evidence, investigators also used other forensic techniques to build their case against the suspects. They examined cell phone records, surveillance footage, and other evidence to establish the suspects' whereabouts at the time of the shootings. They also conducted interviews with witnesses and family members, hoping to gain insight into the suspects' motives.

The forensic evidence gathered by the ballistics team was crucial in convicting the suspects. John Allen Muhammad was sentenced to death, while Lee Boyd Malvo was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The case became a landmark example of the power of forensic ballistics in solving complex criminal investigations.

Conclusion:


Forensic ballistics is a critical component of modern criminal investigations, and the case of the Beltway snipers is just one example of its importance. By examining the ballistic evidence found at crime scenes and comparing it to the weapons used in the crimes, forensic ballistics experts can establish a link between the two, providing crucial evidence in the prosecution of suspects. As forensic technology continues to advance, we can expect forensic ballistics to play an even more significant role in solving crimes and bringing criminals to justice.

Post a Comment

0 Comments